Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Of the four widely available different options, often denoted as HC0-HC3, the HC3 specification appears to work best, with tests relying on the HC3 estimator featuring better power and closer proximity to the targeted size, especially in small samples. The larger the sample, the smaller the difference between the different estimators. [12]
where T is the sample size, is the residual and is the row of the design matrix, and is the Bartlett kernel [8] and can be thought of as a weight that decreases with increasing separation between samples. Disturbances that are farther apart from each other are given lower weight, while those with equal subscripts are given a weight of 1.
In equations, the typical symbol for degrees of freedom is ν (lowercase Greek letter nu).In text and tables, the abbreviation "d.f." is commonly used. R. A. Fisher used n to symbolize degrees of freedom but modern usage typically reserves n for sample size.
The sample covariance matrix has in the denominator rather than due to a variant of Bessel's correction: In short, the sample covariance relies on the difference between each observation and the sample mean, but the sample mean is slightly correlated with each observation since it is defined in terms of all observations.
Dunnett's test's calculation is a procedure that is based on calculating confidence statements about the true or the expected values of the differences ¯ ¯, thus the differences between treatment groups' mean and control group's mean.
In Petrophysics a Klinkenberg correction is a procedure for calibration of permeability data obtained from a minipermeameter device. A more accurate correction factor can be obtained using Knudsen correction .
Chi-squared distribution, showing χ 2 on the x-axis and p-value (right tail probability) on the y-axis.. A chi-squared test (also chi-square or χ 2 test) is a statistical hypothesis test used in the analysis of contingency tables when the sample sizes are large.
The theory of median-unbiased estimators was revived by George W. Brown in 1947: [8]. An estimate of a one-dimensional parameter θ will be said to be median-unbiased, if, for fixed θ, the median of the distribution of the estimate is at the value θ; i.e., the estimate underestimates just as often as it overestimates.