Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
written by Spencer Feingold, explains the pink tax and how it hinders women across the United States. The main criticisms of the pink tax consist of being a financial burden, contributing to gender inequality, reducing economic participation, and creating barriers to economic equality.
Gender-based price discrimination is also described as pink tax. Gender-based price discrimination exists in many industries including insurance, dry cleaning, hairdressing, nightclubs, clothing, personal care products, discount prices and consumption taxes.
Two new reports show that women are paying what’s become known as a kind of “pink” tax for their health care.
The result: a covert “pink tax,” a colloquial term that refers to the higher price women pay for the exact same product as men—be it disposable razors, laxatives, children’s bike helmets ...
Texas recently outlawed sales tax on menstrual products and baby diapers. It’s important to realize the pink tax isn’t always a tax, per se — although in the case of underwear tariffs, it is.
Proponents of tax exemption argue that tampons, sanitary napkins, menstrual cups and comparable products constitute basic, unavoidable necessities for women, and any additional taxes constitute a pink tax.
The phenomenon known as the “pink tax,” when products and services aimed at women cost more than their counterparts aimed at men, is well-documented across many goods and services.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Pink money describes the purchasing power of the LGBT community, often especially with respect to political donations. With the rise of the gay rights movement, pink money has gone from being a fringe or marginalized market to a thriving industry in many parts of the Western world such as the United States and United Kingdom.
Women pay an average of $1,350 a year just for being women.