enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: scam site checker

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Identify legitimate AOL websites, requests, and communications

    help.aol.com/articles/identify-legitimate-aol...

    Identify legitimate AOL websites, requests, and communications. Scammers and bad actors are always looking for ways to get personal info with malicious intent. Know how to recognize legitimate...

  3. FactCheck.org - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FactCheck.org

    Most of its content consists of rebuttals on inaccurate, misleading, or false claims made by politicians. FactCheck.org has also targeted misinformation from various partisan groups. Other features include: Ask FactCheck: [4] users can ask questions that are usually based on an online rumor.

  4. List of Scamming Websites: 11 Fake Shopping Sites To Avoid - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/list-scamming-websites-11...

    Commerce sites can be helpful and deliver exactly what you want or need. In other situations, they can leave you with false hopes, charges on your credit card and very little or nothing to show for...

  5. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

    Ellinikahoaxes.gr: Greek fact-checking website launched in 2013. Debunks hoaxes, urban legends, fake news, internet scams and other stories of questionable origin. Greece Fact Check: independent Greek fact-checking website launched in February 2017 specializing in pseudoscience and medical frauds. Italy

  6. Protect yourself from internet scams - AOL Help

    help.aol.com/articles/protect-yourself-from...

    Phishing scams happen when you receive an email that looks like it came from a company you trust (like AOL), but is ultimately from a hacker trying to get your information. All legitimate AOL...

  7. Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

    Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by Dave M. Van Zandt. It considers four main categories and multiple subcategories in assessing the "political bias" and "factual reporting" of media outlets. It is widely used, but has been criticized for its methodology.