enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Category:Review websites - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Review_websites

   This category has the following 8 subcategories, out of 8 total. American review websites ‎ (1 C, 90 P)

3. Review site - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_site

   Rating site. A rating site (commonly known as a rate-me site) is a website designed for users to vote, rate people, content, or other things. Rating sites can range from tangible to non-tangible attributes, but most commonly, rating sites are based around physical appearances such as body parts, voice, personality, etc.

4. Opinion - FTC rules on fake reviews aren’t enough: Hold sites ...

   www.aol.com/opinion-ftc-rules-fake-reviews...

   Review-sellers on Instagram regularly recruit Yelp Elites, Yelp’s most trusted and prestigious reviewers, and pay them $20 to $50 to post pre-written Yelp reviews of businesses.

5. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

   Comprobado (hosted by Maldita.es). [138] Miniver.org: the first fact-checking web in Spain, launched in 2017, with the purpose of debunking fake news. Accredited by Google as fact-checking organization. [139] Newtral: Spanish fact-checking organization founded by journalist Ana Pastor from LaSexta.

6. RogerEbert.com - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RogerEbert.com

   RogerEbert.com is an American film review website that archives reviews written by film critic Roger Ebert for the Chicago Sun-Times and also shares other critics' reviews and essays. The website, underwritten by the Chicago Sun-Times, was launched in 2002. [1] Ebert handpicked writers from around the world to contribute to the website. After ...

7. Wikipedia Review - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Review

   Wikipedia Review is an Internet forum and blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Foundation projects, in particular the content and conflicts of Wikipedia. [3][4] Wikipedia Review sought to act as a watchdog website, scrutinizing Wikipedia and reporting on its flaws. [5] It provides an independent forum to discuss Wikipedia editors and their ...