Ads
related to: examples of reliable websites
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An American websites with focus on "political bias" and "factual reporting". [219] [220].Metabunk: A discussion forum setup by Mick West that covers such topics as pseudoscience, UFOs and the paranormal. The website also includes a forum, "Skydentify", where West invites people to send photos and videos of UFOs and supposed ghosts. NPR Fact Check.
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 24 September 2024. There is 1 pending revision awaiting review. For satirical news, see List of satirical news websites. This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources. Fake news websites are those ...
An issued patent may be considered a reliable source for the existence of the patent (or application), the names of the inventors, the date of the patent, and the overall content of what was invented. Government patent authorities, however, do not fact-check, edit or endorse any material in the patent application.
For example, the Moon landing conspiracy theories article may include material from reliable websites, movies, television specials, and books that are not peer-reviewed. By parity of sources , critiques of that material can likewise be gleaned from reliable websites and books that are not peer-reviewed.
No. Launched. December 2003; 20 years ago (2003-12) FactCheck.org is a nonprofit [1] website that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics by providing original research on misinformation and hoaxes. [2] It is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University ...
The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
Refdesk - free and family-friendly web site that indexes and reviews quality, credible, and current web-based resources. DeepDyve - big archive of literary and scholarly journal articles; free five-minute full-text previews. Library of free projects - Free project resources (but no software).
Ads
related to: examples of reliable websites