enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: protective pretty phone cases

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 7 iPhone Cases to Protect Your Device in Style - AOL

    www.aol.com/12-best-iphone-cases-protect...

    It'll protect your phone from drops, debris, and other such hazards, but it's also IP68 certified. That means that it can survive immersion in up 1.5 meters of water for up to 30 minutes. There's ...

  3. Our editors' favorite phone cases of 2023 - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/editors-favorite-phone-cases...

    Protection: Drop-height resistance is the most important thing to look for when buying a phone case, according to Hatano. A hard polycarbonate or soft silicone are the best materials to use ...

  4. 6 Waterproof Phone Cases That'll Keep Your Device Safe - AOL

    www.aol.com/6-waterproof-phone-cases-thatll...

    Waterproof Case. Let's be honest, no truly waterproof phone case is going to be as minimal as your slim day-to-day phone case, but this Temdan case comes pretty close.

  5. Mobile phone accessories - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_accessories

    Bumpers. Flip cases and wallets. Screen protection and body films. Drop and shock protection. Leather cases. Cases with integrated kick stands. Battery cases. Cases with protection devices. Holsters are commonly used as external cases for devices, and/or are made of plastic and without exposed rigid corners.

  6. LifeProof - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LifeProof

    LifeProof is a U.S. consumer electronics accessory company headquartered in San Diego, California, and was acquired in 2013 by OtterBox. The company designs, manufactures, and markets cases that protect the functionality and condition of smartphones and tablets from water, snow, dirt, and shock. [1] Their products include cases, flotation ...

  7. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose...

    Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court copyright law case that established that a commercial parody can qualify as fair use. [1] This case established that the fact that money is made by a work does not make it impossible for fair use to apply; it is merely one of the components of a fair use analysis.