Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An alternative correction that is believed to be less conservative is the Huynh–Feldt correction (1976). As a general rule of thumb, the Greenhouse–Geisser correction is the preferred correction method when the epsilon estimate is below 0.75. Otherwise, the Huynh–Feldt correction is preferred. [3]
However, the sample size required for the sample means to converge to normality depends on the skewness of the distribution of the original data. The sample can vary from 30 to 100 or higher values depending on the skewness. [23] [24] F For non-normal data, the distribution of the sample variance may deviate substantially from a χ 2 distribution.
This is because () is the smallest in each one of the intersection sub-families and the size of the sub-families is at most , such that the Bonferroni threshold larger than /. The same rationale applies for H ( 2 ) {\displaystyle H_{(2)}} .
Let m be the size of the sample from the first population. Let m 1 be the number of observations (in the sample) in category #1; so the number of observations in category #2 is m − m 1. Similarly, let n be the size of the sample from the second population. Let n 1 be the number of observations (in the sample) in category #1.
In sampling theory, the sampling fraction is the ratio of sample size to population size or, in the context of stratified sampling, the ratio of the sample size to the size of the stratum. [1] The formula for the sampling fraction is =, where n is the sample size and N is the population size. A sampling fraction value close to 1 will occur if ...
Of the four widely available different options, often denoted as HC0-HC3, the HC3 specification appears to work best, with tests relying on the HC3 estimator featuring better power and closer proximity to the targeted size, especially in small samples. The larger the sample, the smaller the difference between the different estimators. [12]
The Šidák correction is derived by assuming that the individual tests are independent. Let the significance threshold for each test be α 1 {\displaystyle \alpha _{1}} ; then the probability that at least one of the tests is significant under this threshold is (1 - the probability that none of them are significant).
Although the 30 samples were all simulated under the null, one of the resulting p-values is small enough to produce a false rejection at the typical level 0.05 in the absence of correction. Multiple comparisons arise when a statistical analysis involves multiple simultaneous statistical tests, each of which has a potential to produce a "discovery".