enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bessel's correction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel's_correction

    In statistics, Bessel's correction is the use of n − 1 instead of n in the formula for the sample variance and sample standard deviation, where n is the number of observations in a sample. This method corrects the bias in the estimation of the population variance.

  3. Sample size determination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination

    To determine an appropriate sample size n for estimating proportions, the equation below can be solved, where W represents the desired width of the confidence interval. The resulting sample size formula, is often applied with a conservative estimate of p (e.g., 0.5): = /

  4. Welch's t-test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welch's_t-test

    where ¯ and ¯ are the sample mean and its standard error, with denoting the corrected sample standard deviation, and sample size.

  5. Fisher's exact test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher's_exact_test

    For example, in the R statistical computing environment, this value can be obtained as fisher.test(rbind(c(1,9),c(11,3)), alternative="less")$p.value, or in Python, using scipy.stats.fisher_exact(table=[[1,9],[11,3]], alternative="less") (where one receives both the prior odds ratio and the p -value).

  6. Unbiased estimation of standard deviation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unbiased_estimation_of...

    The use of n − 1 instead of n in the formula for the sample variance is known as Bessel's correction, which corrects the bias in the estimation of the population variance, and some, but not all of the bias in the estimation of the population standard deviation.

  7. Yates's correction for continuity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yates's_correction_for...

    To reduce the error in approximation, Frank Yates, an English statistician, suggested a correction for continuity that adjusts the formula for Pearson's chi-squared test by subtracting 0.5 from the difference between each observed value and its expected value in a 2 × 2 contingency table.

  8. Design effect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_effect

    This also influences the sample size (overall, per stratum, per cluster, etc.). When planning the sample size, work may be done to correct the design effect so as to separate the interviewer effect (measurement error) from the effects of the sampling design on the sampling variance.

  9. Standard error - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_error

    This approximate formula is for moderate to large sample sizes; the reference gives the exact formulas for any sample size, and can be applied to heavily autocorrelated time series like Wall Street stock quotes. Moreover, this formula works for positive and negative ρ alike. See also unbiased estimation of standard deviation for more discussion.

  10. McNemar's test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McNemar's_test

    With these data, the sample size (161 patients) is not small, however results from the McNemar test and other versions are different. The exact binomial test gives p = 0.053 and McNemar's test with continuity correction gives = 3.68 and p = 0.055.

  11. Sampling fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_fraction

    In sampling theory, the sampling fraction is the ratio of sample size to population size or, in the context of stratified sampling, the ratio of the sample size to the size of the stratum. The formula for the sampling fraction is =, where n is the sample size and N is the population size. A sampling fraction value close to 1 will occur if the ...